What we never publish — and how we handle it when we get something wrong.

A review site is only as useful as the things it refuses to do. This page lists the hard rules every editor on Best OnlyFans Reviews follows, the practices we explicitly forbid, and the correction policy we apply when we make a mistake.

Enforced by The Guide Last reviewed 7 May 2026 · Updated annually or whenever a rule changes · Version 1.2

What we never publish

The list below is non-negotiable. There is no editorial circumstance — no scoop, no traffic incentive, no pressure from any party — that overrides any of these rules.

1. Leaked content. No screenshots, video clips, or descriptions of paid-side content distributed without the creator's consent. We do not link to leak repositories. We do not host caches of "preview" frames sourced from leaks.
2. Scraped previews. No bulk-scraped public images that aggregate a creator's content into a comparison gallery without their knowledge or consent. Public single-image use under fair use only.
3. Paid placements without disclosure. Sponsored content, paid placements, and affiliated promotions are clearly marked with the word "Sponsored" in the page header and a disclosure block. None of our published rankings or scores are sponsored.
4. Fake reviews. We do not commission, fabricate, or paraphrase user testimonials. Quotes attributed to subscribers come from public sources we link to.
5. Impersonation. Creator-attributed quotes are verified through official channels (the verified OnlyFans profile or a confirmed alternate platform). Anonymous tips are flagged as such.
6. Doxxing or off-platform identity reveals. We do not publish a creator's legal name, location, employer, or any off-platform identity unless they themselves have publicly disclosed it.
7. Underage or non-consensual content references. Any creator account flagged for underage content or non-consensual material is reported to the platform and removed from our listings immediately.
8. "Best of" lists ranked by physical attributes. Our rankings score creators on the methodology factors, not on appearance. Niche-specific aesthetic relevance (cosplay accuracy, fitness genre fit) is acceptable; ranking creators by attractiveness is not.

The walls between revenue and editorial

Two separate workflows operate inside the site, and they do not touch.

Editorial workflow: a creator is identified for review, audited against the six-factor methodology, scored, written up, and published. The editor running the audit does not know which creators participate in any affiliate program.

Revenue workflow: affiliate links and creator referrals are managed separately. They are added to published pages after editorial completion. They are visually marked. They never adjust scoring inputs, weights, or rank order.

The two workflows share only one piece of state: the published page itself. A creator's affiliate participation does not get them on the site. A creator's editorial score does not unlock affiliate participation. Each is a function of separate inputs.

AI, automation, and human oversight

We use software to help with structured tasks: generating comparison tables, normalising public data, drafting consistent score-card templates, and re-formatting source citations. We do not use language models to fabricate creator-attributed quotes, simulate subscriber testimonials, or produce review prose published without human review.

Every score, ranking position, recommendation, and editorial paragraph that appears on the site has been read and approved by a human editor before publication. Where we use software-generated structure, the underlying data and the human judgement are still ours.

How affiliate links are marked

Three signals tell readers a link is affiliate-monetised:

• The link's HTML rel attribute includes sponsored (per Google's webmaster guidelines).
• The link's rel attribute also includes nofollow (we do not pass authority through paid links).
• Pages with affiliate-driven CTAs include a footer disclosure block linking to the full disclosures page.

Where a button or call-to-action sends readers to the official OnlyFans platform, the link is treated as affiliate-monetised by default — regardless of whether a particular session converts.

Correction policy

We get things wrong sometimes. When we do, the goal is to fix the record visibly, not quietly.

1. Submission. Send the dispute through the contact form on creator submission with subject "Correction". Include: page URL, specific claim, public source for the corrected fact.
2. Acknowledgement. We acknowledge receipt within 2 business days.
3. Review. An editor independent of the original audit reviews the dispute against the methodology and the source provided.
4. Resolution. We respond within 5 business days with the outcome: corrected, partially corrected, or declined with reasoning.
5. Public note. When we correct a published claim, the page receives a dated correction note at the bottom describing what changed and why.

We do not silently delete content we have got wrong. The correction note is the receipt.

Creator takedown requests

Creators who appear on the site and want to be removed can request takedown by contacting us through the same channel. We process verified takedowns within 5 business days. We do not require a legal threat to honour a takedown — a request from the verified creator account is sufficient.

Takedown does not erase historical references where the creator's name appears in editorial commentary about the methodology or the niche generally. It does remove the creator's score, ranking position, and any creator-specific page from the live site.

Conflicts of interest

Editors disclose any pre-existing relationship with a creator before participating in the audit. If an editor has subscribed to, communicated with, or otherwise interacted with a creator outside of the editorial process in the prior 12 months, that creator is reassigned to a different editor.

We do not accept gifts, free subscriptions, or "media access" from creators or agencies. We do not accept payment, in any form, to alter a published page after the fact except through the correction process above.

Version history

• 1.2 (7 May 2026) — Added explicit AI/automation oversight section. Clarified takedown timeline.
• 1.1 (15 Apr 2026) — Added underage/non-consensual content escalation rule.
• 1.0 (1 Mar 2026) — Initial publication.

Frequently asked questions